v1.0 industry review edition. Coverage, methodology and entity pages open for correction through March 2027. Release cadence.
Email [email protected].

Colas Rail — Period 1 2026-27 (29 March – 25 April) report

Colas Rail ran 1,707 freight services in Period 1 2026-27 at 93% A2F punctuality, against a national freight mean of 89% over 14,267 services. Colas ranked first against peer freight operators on 0 of the 14 corridors it shared with another FOC over the period. Schedule 8 monetises every minute of attributable delay at CP7 rates: £25.81/min (NR-to-FOC) and £51.98/min (FOC-to-NR).

Edition
v1.0 (industry review edition)
Last updated
25 April 2026
Next update
Period 2 2026-27 — final on 24 May 2026

Headline facts and figures

Services monitored

1,707

61.0/day across the national network; Period 1 2026-27 (29 Mar – 25 Apr 2026); NROD-derived journey data, cancellations excluded; baseline 1,667 services in Period 13 2025-26, see data-window methodology; queried gauge_intelligence_v2 at 2026-05-28

A2F punctuality

93%

90% Wilson interval 92%–94%, 1,707 services; national mean across all freight operators 89% over 14,267 services in Period 1 2026-27; queried gauge_intelligence_v2 at 2026-05-28

Daily A2F range

86%–100%

28 calendar days; daily values normally fell between 86% and 100% around a 93% period mean; day-to-day variation was consistent with a stable process, see anomaly-detection methodology; queried gauge_intelligence_v2 at 2026-05-28

Peer comparison

0 of 14

Shared corridors on which Colas Rail ranked first against peer freight operators; below at least one peer on the remaining 14; aggregated by operator from TRUST toc_id, see league-table methodology; queried gauge_intelligence_v2 at 2026-05-28

Context

ORR publishes aggregates only; this page publishes operator-by-corridor data. Material to bid teams and track-access negotiators given CP7 rates of £25.81/min (NR-to-FOC) and £51.98/min (FOC-to-NR).

What you can do with it

  • Compare any operator to peers on every shared corridor.
  • Quantify a period's CP7 exposure.
  • Cite the methodology, not a vendor's number, in negotiations.

Who can use it

Freight operations leaders · Track-access negotiators · Freight procurement teams · Rail journalists

What this page measures

The page makes three things possible. Every shared corridor is ranked: an operator's A2F sits next to active peer freight operators on that corridor, with a 90% interval around each figure. A period's CP7 exposure is computed from the operator's own services rather than national aggregates. The methodology behind each figure is named, dated, and reproducible, so track-access negotiations and academic citations can reference the published method rather than a vendor's number.


Colas Rail ran 1,707 freight services across the national network between 29 March and 25 April 2026 (Period 1 of the 2026-27 rail year). Traffic moved principally on aggregates and infrastructure-materials flows into Westbury, plus engineering flows via Bescot, Eastleigh, and Crewe yards. Figures aggregate every monitored Colas Rail journey. The dataset is keyed by toc_id from Network Rail's NROD/TRUST feed; cancellations are excluded from the denominator. The commercial-licence panel near the foot lists the four derivations released to subscribers.

Daily on-time arrivals across Period 1 2026-27

Daily on-time arrivals are up 0.8 percentage points on Period 13 2025-26 (92% then, 93% now).

Range 86%–100% across 28 days. Weekend mean 92% vs weekday 94% (-1.6 percentage points). Mean 93%.

Period 1 2026-27 daily A2F averaged 94% across 28 observations. One or more observations fell outside the expected range (1 day(s) beyond the expected range), indicating an unusual event rather than ordinary noise.

Mean punctuality in Period 13 2025-26 was 92%. The current period is up 0.8 percentage points on Period 13 2025-26.

Source: Gauge Intelligence NROD-derived journey data, Period 1 2026-27. A service is counted on time when terminal arrival falls within 15 minutes of schedule. Days with no scheduled services (typically Sundays) render as gaps — a missing bar means no measurement, not a value at zero. Red bars flag days that triggered a statistical signal — see anomaly-detection methodology.

ORR's Freight rail usage and performance release publishes by Network Rail region and route, not by operator. This page publishes by operator and corridor.


Cancellation rate

In Period 1 2026-27, 3% of scheduled services were cancelled (75 of 2558) — within the national mean of 7%; FOC traction, crew, and terminal decisions accounted for the largest share.

Cancellations are down 2.10 percentage points on Period 13 2025-26 (5% then, 3% now). The largest shifts in the responsible-party split are reported in the table below.

Scheduled or activated paths 2,558
Cancelled (post-activation + pre-activation) 75
Cancellation rate 3% 2%–4%
National cancellation rate (all freight) 7%

Attribution

Responsible party Cancellations Share of cancelled
Network Rail infrastructure and possessions 5 7%
FOC traction, crew, and terminal decisions 62 83%
Third party 0 0%
Unattributed 8 11%

Cancellation rate in Period 13 2025-26 was 5% across 2,540 scheduled paths. The current period is down 2.10 percentage points on Period 13 2025-26.

Source: NROD/TRUST activation feed and BPLAN scheduled paths, Period 1 2026-27. Cancellation rate = (post-activation + pre-activation cancellations) ÷ scheduled or activated paths. Pre-activation cancellations are TRUST CANCEL messages on schedules that never activated; post-activation cancellations have an activation and a CANCEL event. The bracketed range beside the headline rate is the 90% confidence range on the cancellation proportion given the sample size. Cause attribution uses the responsible-party mapping of the recorded cancellation reason code; see delay-attribution methodology.


Colas and peer operators, by shared corridor

The per-corridor league table for Colas is deferred while the v1.0 industry review edition corrections inbox remains open. Comparative ranking against peer freight operators on each shared corridor returns at v2.0 general availability, after the launch-cohort corrections cycle closes and the dataset has been reviewed by industry readers. The league-table methodology sets out the partial-pool estimator and the Wilson interval framework the panel will use; the release cadence page sets out the four exit criteria for v2.0 and the schedule against which they are measured.

Source: Gauge Intelligence NROD-derived journey data, Period 1 2026-27. Single-operator Wilson intervals on shared corridors continue to appear in the per-corridor breakdowns above; the per-corridor ranking against peers is the panel deferred here.


What the 15-minute threshold hides

Half of Period 1 2026-27 services arrived early — the median was 5 min ahead of timetable. The long tail the A2F binary misses: 5% of services ran +21 min or more late, and 1% arrived over +87 min late. The 15-minute A2F threshold sits at the 93th percentile — 7% of services exceeded it.

Median arrival delay is essentially unchanged on Period 13 2025-26 (-5 min then, -5 min now).

Percentile Arrival delay
50th percentile (median) — A2F threshold sits at the 93th percentile -5 min
75th percentile — A2F threshold sits at the 93th percentile +0 min
85th percentile — A2F threshold sits at the 93th percentile +5 min
90th percentile — A2F threshold sits at the 93th percentile +10 min
95th percentile +21 min
99th percentile +87 min

1,652 services with confirmed terminal arrival in Period 1 2026-27. A2F is binary at 15 minutes — this distribution surfaces what the headline figure does not show. National 99th percentile across all freight operators: 100 min.

Baseline (Period 13 2025-26): median -5 min, p99 +72 min. Period-on-period median shift +0 min.

ORR's Freight rail usage and performance release publishes by Network Rail region and route, not by operator. This page publishes by operator and corridor.


Intraday pattern

Fri (95%) is 3.2 percentage points above Mon (92%), the weakest day in Period 1 2026-27.

The 08-12 departure window records 90% A2F — 6.6 percentage points below the 12-16 peak (96%) in Period 1 2026-27.

The day-of-week spread is narrower by 2.1 percentage points on Period 13 2025-26 — punctuality varies less across the working week than the prior period.

By day of week

Day Services A2F% 90% Wilson
Mon 273 92% 88%–94%
Tue 320 93% 91%–95%
Wed 314 95% 92%–96%
Thu 266 93% 90%–95%
Fri 194 95% 92%–97%
Sat 146 92% 87%–95%
Sun 190 92% 88%–95%

By departure hour

Departure window Services A2F% 90% Wilson
00-04 196 92% 89%–95%
04-08 381 96% 94%–97%
08-12 274 90% 86%–92%
12-16 166 96% 93%–98%
16-20 169 94% 90%–96%
20-24 517 92% 90%–94%

Baseline (Period 13 2025-26) day-of-week spread delta: -2.1 percentage points.

Source: NROD-derived journey data, Period 1 2026-27. Day-of-week is ISO (Mon=1..Sun=7). Hour windows are 4-hour buckets keyed off TRUST origin_dep_timestamp. A2F threshold is 15 minutes on terminal arrival. 90% Wilson interval on each cell's proportion.


Path utilisation

Activated 1,303 of 2,558 scheduled paths (51%, 90% range 49%–53%) in Period 1 2026-27 — +18.9 percentage points above the national freight-operator mean of 32%. 1,255 ghost paths (scheduled, not activated).

In plain terms: a scheduled path is a freight slot reserved in Network Rail's Working Timetable. An activated path is one where TRUST recorded the train starting its run. A ghost path is a scheduled slot that produced no activation — capacity held in the timetable that the operator did not use, typically because the underlying contract did not call the path or the service was withdrawn before the day. A sub-100% rate is normal: the Working Timetable carries contingency and capacity-reservation paths by design. See the path-utilisation methodology for how scheduled, activated, and ghost paths are derived.

Scheduled paths (after STP precedence) 2,558
Activated 1,303
Ghost paths 1,255
STP-cancelled (excluded from denominator) 921
Activation rate 51% 49%–53%
National FOC mean 32%

Free-tier: operator-total activation rate and ghost count for Period 1 2026-27. Per-corridor path utilisation, per-path scheduling-pattern analysis, and spot-contract renewal guidance are released to commercial-licence subscribers. The activation rate measures Working-Timetable path-days that materialised as activations — not operator delivery performance against intent. Capacity-reservation paths and contingency optionality in the WTT mean a sub-100% rate is a transparency datum, not a delivery indictment.

Source: BPLAN schedule import and TRUST journey activation feeds, Period 1 2026-27. STP precedence (C > O > N > P) is applied per (train_uid, date) pair via Schedule.effective_for; STP-cancelled path-days are excluded from the denominator. VSTP activations (no Schedule row) are excluded from both numerator and denominator. 90% Wilson interval on the proportion. National FOC mean computed across the known FOC universe in the same window — see path-utilisation methodology.


Schedule 8 net position

Bilateral Schedule 8 settlement runs at two rates under CP7: operators pay Network Rail £51.98 per minute of operator-attributed delay; Network Rail pays operators £25.81 per minute of NR-attributed delay. The asymmetry produces a net position on every period for every operator; its sign and size depend on the period's bilateral delay-minute mix at rates that do not move within a control period.

The bilateral net position for Period 1 2026-27 on services operated by Colas Rail, together with the per-corridor decomposition, the rate-gap counterfactual against an equal-rate benchmark, and the period-on-period swing, is released to commercial-licence subscribers.

Per-corridor and per-day Schedule 8 net-position figures, and the full responsibility-party breakdown, are released to commercial-licence subscribers.

Source: Network Rail Historic Delay Attribution (HDA) for Period 1 2026-27, ingested into delay_attributions with source: "trust". CP7 rates are published by ORR and applied uniformly across all operators. See delay-attribution methodology.


Delay attribution party split

Across 107 attribution rows totalling 251 delay minutes in Period 1 2026-27 for services operated by Colas Rail, Network Rail carries 100%, operators carry 0%, and third parties carry 0% of the attributed delay minutes.

Network Rail's share of attributed minutes is up 49.2 percentage points on Period 13 2025-26 (51% then, 100% now). Operator share moved down 22.7 percentage points alongside — the bilateral mix of attributed minutes shifted, not the total volume of delay.

Responsible party Delay minutes Share of minutes
Network Rail 251 100%
Operator 0 0%
Third party 0 0%

Baseline (Period 13 2025-26): NR 51%, operator 23%, third party 27%. Period-on-period NR share shift +49.2 percentage points.

Cause-code level breakdowns and per-corridor decomposition are released to commercial-licence subscribers.

Source: Network Rail Historic Delay Attribution (HDA) for Period 1 2026-27. Responsibility parties follow the DAPR mapping in the delay_attribution_codes table. See delay-attribution methodology.


What this page does not measure

Pre-activation cancellations fall outside the dataset: TRUST requires an activation event before it records a journey, so services cancelled before activation produce no TRUST record. VSTPs are excluded from the path-utilisation denominator because no Working Timetable row exists against which to measure them. Journeys without a confirmed terminal arrival are excluded from the delay distribution. The 15-minute A2F threshold is a regulatory artefact, not a natural cut-off — the "What the 15-minute threshold hides" panel surfaces the distribution behind that line.


Commercial licence

Four derivations are released to commercial-licence subscribers rather than the public archive. Each one reconciles TRUST source-data against Network Rail's Historic Delay Attribution record independently, not republished from public statistics.

Available under commercial licence. Contact [email protected] for subscription terms.


Methodology & sources

All figures derive from Network Rail's NROD TRUST feed, processed via the Gauge Intelligence ingest pipeline. Period definitions, A2F (Arrival to Fifteen), the Wilson 90% interval, daily anomaly rules, cross-view reconciliation, and delay attribution are documented at:

Data window — period boundaries and the data-as-of cutoff
League tables — cross-view reconciliation across the four analytical views
Anomaly detection — daily A2F SPC rules
Delay attribution — DAPR cause-code breakdown
Forecasting — prediction intervals and possession-exposure estimates

Regulatory context

Network Rail's Control Period 7 obligation, fixed in ORR's PR23 conclusions, imposes a 1.3% target on the Freight Cancellations and Lateness (FCaL) metric by March 2029. A2F is the operator-perspective version of the same threshold: the cancellation-plus-lateness measure that drives the obligation. ORR's Freight rail usage and performance release records that its statistical publications do not compare results against targets. This page does, against the CP7 target and over time.

Revisions

No revisions to date.

A revision restates a published figure because the upstream data changed, typically a Network Rail delay-attribution refresh. The minor tier is corrected in the next release; cells affected carry an (r) flag. The intermediate tier triggers immediate amendment with an (r) flag. The wholesale tier is flagged at the top of the page and notified directly to operators and rail journalists subscribed to revision alerts.

Corrections

No corrections to date.

A correction fixes an error in the published output: an arithmetic slip, a typo, a mis-rendered chart. Revisions are different; they restate a figure because the upstream data changed. The distinction matters because corrections never silently rewrite a published number.