Coatbridge — Period 1 2026-27 (29 March – 25 April) report
Coatbridge received 147 monitored inbound services in Period 1 2026-27 — 85% arrived within 15 minutes of schedule across 143 completed arrivals, against a national freight benchmark of 89%. The +4 percentage-point move on Period 13 2025-26 (81%) sits within plausible sampling variation; the ranges around each reading overlap.
- Edition
- v1.0 (industry review edition)
- Last updated
- 25 April 2026
- Next update
- Period 2 2026-27 — final on 24 May 2026
Headline facts and figures
Services monitored
147
Across the two Coatbridge terminal TIPLOCs (COATDRS, COATFLT); Period 1 2026-27 (29 Mar – 25 Apr 2026); NROD-derived arrivals data; baseline 296 services in Period 13 2025-26; queried gauge_intelligence_v2 at 2026-05-28
Within 15 minutes
85%
122 of 143 completed services arriving within 15 minutes of schedule (Wilson 90% interval 80%–90% given the sample size); baseline 81% [76%–84%] over 249 completed services in Period 13 2025-26 — ranges overlap; national freight benchmark 89% over 14,267 services in Period 1 2026-27; queried gauge_intelligence_v2 at 2026-05-28
Cancellation rate
3%
4 cancellations across 147 scheduled paths; baseline 16% (47 of 296) in Period 13 2025-26 — a substantial improvement on the period; queried gauge_intelligence_v2 at 2026-05-28
Busiest operator
Direct Rail Services
85 of 143 completed arrivals (59%); aggregated by operator from TRUST toc_id; Period 1 2026-27; down from 67% share in Period 13 2025-26; queried gauge_intelligence_v2 at 2026-05-28
Context
ORR publishes aggregates only; this page publishes destination-attributed terminal-level data. Material to yard planning, terminal allocation, and inland-terminal performance reviews.
What you can do with it
- Track arrivals reliability at an inland terminal, attributed by destination TIPLOC.
- Compare operator-by-operator reliability on services inbound to a single terminal.
- Cite the methodology in terminal operations and corridor reviews.
Who can use it
Inland terminal operators · Yard planners · Rail journalists
Across Period 1 2026-27, roughly 0 inbound trains a day arrived at Coatbridge more than 15 minutes late, about 1 in 9 of 121 completed arrivals over the 28-day period, 13 late arrivals in total. Figures aggregate every monitored journey arriving at the two Coatbridge terminal TIPLOCs inbound along the Anglo-Scottish corridor, drawn from Network Rail's NROD/TRUST feed. Cancellations are reported separately below.
Operators at Coatbridge-inbound
Direct Rail Services ran the most coatbridge-inbound services in Period 1 2026-27 (84 of 121 completed arrivals). The full per-operator reliability comparison is deferred while the v1.0 industry review edition corrections inbox remains open.
Publishing a per-operator on-time comparison for the busiest freight operators at a single destination before the launch-cohort corrections cycle closes would treat provisional attribution as settled. The table returns at v2.0 general availability. The league-table methodology documents the comparison framework; the release cadence page sets out the four exit criteria for v2.0.
Source: Gauge Intelligence NROD-derived journey data, Period 1 2026-27. Single-destination headline figures (completed arrivals, aggregate within-15-minute rate, cancellations) continue to appear in the panels above; the per-operator breakdown is the panel deferred here.
What the 15-minute threshold hides
Half of Period 1 2026-27 services arrived early — the median was 1 min ahead of timetable. The long tail the A2F binary misses: 5% of services ran +45 min or more late, and 1% arrived over +101 min late. The 15-minute A2F threshold sits at the 84th percentile — 17% of services exceeded it.
Median arrival delay is 1 minutes earlier than Period 13 2025-26 (median was 0 min then, -1 min now).
| Percentile | Arrival delay |
|---|---|
| 50th percentile (median) — A2F threshold sits at the 84th percentile | -1 min |
| 75th percentile — A2F threshold sits at the 84th percentile | +4 min |
| 85th percentile | +20 min |
| 90th percentile | +28 min |
| 95th percentile | +45 min |
| 99th percentile | +101 min |
121 services with confirmed terminal arrival in Period 1 2026-27. A2F is binary at 15 minutes — this distribution surfaces what the headline figure does not show. National 99th percentile across all freight operators: 100 min.
Baseline (Period 13 2025-26): median +0 min, p99 +192 min. Period-on-period median shift -1 min.
ORR's Freight rail usage and performance release publishes by Network Rail region and route, not by operator. This page publishes by operator and corridor.
Cancellation rate
In Period 1 2026-27, 3% of scheduled services were cancelled (5 of 147) — within the national mean of 7%; FOC traction, crew, and terminal decisions accounted for the largest share.
Cancellations are down 13.20 percentage points on Period 13 2025-26 (17% then, 3% now). The largest shifts in the responsible-party split are reported in the table below.
| Scheduled or activated paths | 147 |
| Cancelled (post-activation + pre-activation) | 5 |
| Cancellation rate | 3% 2%–7% |
| National cancellation rate (all freight) | 7% |
Attribution
| Responsible party | Cancellations | Share of cancelled |
|---|---|---|
| Network Rail infrastructure and possessions | 0 | 0% |
| FOC traction, crew, and terminal decisions | 5 | 100% |
| Third party | 0 | 0% |
| Unattributed | 0 | 0% |
Cancellation rate in Period 13 2025-26 was 17% across 296 scheduled paths. The current period is down 13.20 percentage points on Period 13 2025-26.
Source: NROD/TRUST activation feed and BPLAN scheduled paths, Period 1 2026-27. Cancellation rate = (post-activation + pre-activation cancellations) ÷ scheduled or activated paths. Pre-activation cancellations are TRUST CANCEL messages on schedules that never activated; post-activation cancellations have an activation and a CANCEL event. The bracketed range beside the headline rate is the 90% confidence range on the cancellation proportion given the sample size. Cause attribution uses the responsible-party mapping of the recorded cancellation reason code; see delay-attribution methodology.
What this report doesn't yet carry
Three blocks routinely carried on more mature period reports remain absent, and the gap is disclosed rather than papered over:
- SPC process-behaviour chart. The terminal has five weekly A2F points in Period 1 2026-27; the signal rules require eight before a stability or anomaly claim can be made. The block is suppressed.
- Median-polish operator-by-week matrix. The operator mix across weekly cells is below the minimum-journeys threshold for a stable row-by-column decomposition at this baseline depth, so the matrix degenerates and no decomposition is published.
- Compositional delay-reason breakdown. Network Rail's Historic Delay Attribution feed for Period 1 2026-27 has not been imported at the as-of date of this report. Raw percentage-share comparison is misleading when shares are constrained to sum to 100% — an increase in any one cause forces a decrease in another — so the block is suppressed rather than substituted with a naked share. See the delay-attribution methodology.
Each of these unlocks as baseline depth grows. The weekly SPC threshold and the operator-by-week matrix become candidates for inclusion as the trailing window deepens through 2026-27.
Methodology & sources
All figures derive from Network Rail's NROD TRUST feed, processed via the Gauge Intelligence ingest pipeline. Period definitions, A2F (Arrival to Fifteen), the Wilson 90% interval, daily anomaly rules, cross-view reconciliation, and delay attribution are documented at:
Data window — period boundaries and the data-as-of cutoff
League tables — cross-view reconciliation across the four analytical views
Anomaly detection — daily A2F SPC rules
Delay attribution — DAPR cause-code breakdown
Forecasting — prediction intervals and possession-exposure estimates
Three further reads sit behind the commercial licence: a Schedule 8 net-position figure netting the FOC-to-Network-Rail differential against payments the other way; a full DAPR breakdown attributing each cause-code's contribution by sample weight; and a Schedule 4 possession-exposure read tracing how planned blockades intersect terminal-bound path allocation. None is yet substantively informative at Coatbridge's current baseline depth — the period count that suppresses the SPC chart above leaves each licensed read with too few points to anchor. The licensed access page sets out the methodology behind each.
Revisions
No revisions to date.
A revision restates a published figure because the upstream data changed, typically a Network Rail delay-attribution refresh. The minor tier is corrected in the next release; cells affected carry an (r) flag. The intermediate tier triggers immediate amendment with an (r) flag. The wholesale tier is flagged at the top of the page and notified directly to operators and rail journalists subscribed to revision alerts.
Corrections
No corrections to date.
A correction fixes an error in the published output: an arithmetic slip, a typo, a mis-rendered chart. Revisions are different; they restate a figure because the upstream data changed. The distinction matters because corrections never silently rewrite a published number.