v1.0 industry review edition. Coverage, methodology and entity pages open for correction through March 2027. Release cadence.
Email [email protected].

Channel Tunnel — Period 13 2025-26 (1–28 March) report

Channel Tunnel recorded 76% A2F punctuality in Period 13 2025-26 (1–28 Mar 2026) on 1,008 freight services traversing the corridor. Inaugural published period — no prior-period comparator yet.

Edition
v1.0 (industry review edition)
Last updated
28 March 2026
Next update
Period 1 2026-27 — 28 May 2026

Headline facts and figures

Services monitored

1,008

Journeys traversing the Channel Tunnel corridor between 1 and 28 March 2026; corridor-attributed; inaugural period — no prior comparator, see data-window methodology; queried gauge_intelligence_v2 at 2026-05-28

A2F punctuality

76%

90% Wilson interval 74%–79%, 1,008 services; inaugural Period 13 2025-26 — no prior-period comparator; queried gauge_intelligence_v2 at 2026-05-28

Cancellations

Cancellation breakdown panel below reports corridor cancellations for Period 13 2025-26

Inaugural disclosure

Period 13

First published Channel Tunnel period snapshot; no change-on-prior-period comparison is published until Period 1 2026-27 lands alongside; queried gauge_intelligence_v2 at 2026-05-28

Context

ORR publishes no corridor-level freight performance; this page publishes operator-by-operator standings on the Channel Tunnel corridor. Material to FOCs operating international intermodal flows via the Eurotunnel and to Network Rail's Southern route performance team.

What you can do with it

  • See every operator's Channel Tunnel rank for the period, with partial-pool stabilisation for small samples.
  • Quantify the corridor's CP7 exposure window.
  • Cite the methodology, not a vendor's number, in negotiations.

Who can use it

Freight operations leaders · Track-access negotiators · Southern route performance · Rail journalists

What this page measures

The page makes three things possible. Every shared corridor is ranked: an operator's A2F sits next to active peer freight operators on that corridor, with a 90% interval around each figure. A period's CP7 exposure is computed from the operator's own services rather than national aggregates. The methodology behind each figure is named, dated, and reproducible, so track-access negotiations and academic citations can reference the published method rather than a vendor's number.


The Channel Tunnel corridor carried 1,008 freight services at 76% A2F punctuality (Wilson 90% 74%–79%) between 1 and 28 March 2026 (Period 13 of the 2025-26 rail year). Figures aggregate every monitored journey that traversed at least one of the corridor's 7 monitoring points, drawn from Network Rail's NROD/TRUST feed. Period 13 is the first published Channel Tunnel snapshot; no prior-period comparator is available. The corridor carries international intermodal flows from Dollands Moor Sidings at the Eurotunnel portal via Folkestone Central, Ashford International, and Tonbridge, continuing through Redhill and Orpington to Hither Green, from where flows reach London-area terminals on the classic route through Kent.


Daily on-time arrivals across Period 13 2025-26

Range 36%–88% across 28 days. Weekend mean 64% vs weekday 79% (-15.3 percentage points). Mean 75%.

Period 13 2025-26 daily A2F averaged 76% across 28 observations. Day-to-day variation was consistent with a stable process — no statistical-signal rule triggered.

Source: Gauge Intelligence NROD-derived journey data, Period 13 2025-26. A service is counted on time when terminal arrival falls within 15 minutes of schedule. Days with no scheduled services (typically Sundays) render as gaps — a missing bar means no measurement, not a value at zero. Red bars flag days that triggered a statistical signal — see anomaly-detection methodology.

ORR's Freight rail usage and performance release publishes by Network Rail region and route, not by operator. This page publishes by operator and corridor.


Cancellation rate

In Period 13 2025-26, 10% of scheduled services were cancelled (107 of 1107) — within the national mean of 14%; FOC traction, crew, and terminal decisions accounted for the largest share.

Scheduled or activated paths 1,107
Cancelled (post-activation + pre-activation) 107
Cancellation rate 10% 8%–11%
National cancellation rate (all freight) 14%

Attribution

Responsible party Cancellations Share of cancelled
Network Rail infrastructure and possessions 15 14%
FOC traction, crew, and terminal decisions 83 78%
Third party 0 0%
Unattributed 9 8%

Source: NROD/TRUST activation feed and BPLAN scheduled paths, Period 13 2025-26. Cancellation rate = (post-activation + pre-activation cancellations) ÷ scheduled or activated paths. Pre-activation cancellations are TRUST CANCEL messages on schedules that never activated; post-activation cancellations have an activation and a CANCEL event. The bracketed range beside the headline rate is the 90% confidence range on the cancellation proportion given the sample size. Cause attribution uses the responsible-party mapping of the recorded cancellation reason code; see delay-attribution methodology.


What the 15-minute threshold hides

Half of Period 13 2025-26 services arrived within +4 min of timetable. The long tail the A2F binary misses: 5% of services ran +92 min or more late, and 1% arrived over +256 min late. The 15-minute A2F threshold sits at the 76th percentile — 24% of services exceeded it.

Percentile Arrival delay
50th percentile (median) — A2F threshold sits at the 76th percentile +4 min
75th percentile — A2F threshold sits at the 76th percentile +14 min
85th percentile +32 min
90th percentile +53 min
95th percentile +92 min
99th percentile +256 min

1,000 services with confirmed terminal arrival in Period 13 2025-26. A2F is binary at 15 minutes — this distribution surfaces what the headline figure does not show. National 99th percentile across all freight operators: 98 min.

ORR's Freight rail usage and performance release publishes by Network Rail region and route, not by operator. This page publishes by operator and corridor.


Operator activity on Channel Tunnel

Operator ranking on Channel Tunnel for Period 13 2025-26 is deferred while the v1.0 industry review edition corrections inbox remains open. Publishing a corridor-level ranking against named operators before the launch-cohort corrections cycle closes would treat provisional figures as settled. The ranking returns at v2.0 general availability.

The framework the panel uses — partial-pool shrinkage toward the corridor mean, with rank order taken from the pooled estimate rather than the raw observed rate — is documented at league-table methodology. The schedule for v2.0 general availability is at release cadence.

Source: Gauge Intelligence NROD-derived journey data, Period 13 2025-26. Per-operator counts and single-operator A2F on this corridor continue to appear in the corridor performance panels above; the corridor-internal ranking against peers is the panel deferred here.


Path utilisation

Ran 752 of 2,363 booked paths (32%, 90% Wilson 30%–33%) on Channel Tunnel in Period 13 2025-26. 1,611 ghost paths (booked, not run).

In plain terms: a booked path is a freight slot reserved in Network Rail's Working Timetable that traverses this corridor's monitoring chain. A run path is a booked path that activated and produced a journey segment on the corridor. A ghost path is a booked slot that produced no corridor traversal — capacity held in the timetable that the operator did not use, typically because the underlying contract did not call the path or the service was withdrawn before the day. A sub-100% rate is normal: the Working Timetable carries contingency and capacity-reservation paths by design. See the path-utilisation methodology.

Booked paths (non-STP-cancelled) 2,363
Run 752
Ghost paths 1,611
Activation rate 32% 30%–33%

Free tier: corridor-wide activation rate and ghost count for Period 13 2025-26. Per-operator decomposition and per-path scheduling-pattern analysis are released to commercial-licence subscribers.

Source: BPLAN schedule import and TRUST journey activation feeds, Period 13 2025-26. STP precedence (C > O > N > P) is applied per (train_uid, date) pair via Schedule.effective_for; STP-cancelled path-days are excluded from the booked count. VSTP activations (no Schedule row) are excluded from both numerator and denominator. The UID universe for "booked on this corridor" is FreightService UIDs that have ever produced a journey segment on this corridor; see path-utilisation methodology. 90% Wilson interval on the proportion.


Schedule 8 net position

Bilateral Schedule 8 settlement runs at two rates under CP7: operators pay Network Rail £51.98 per minute of operator-attributed delay; Network Rail pays operators £25.81 per minute of NR-attributed delay. The asymmetry produces a net position on every period for every operator; its sign and size depend on the period's bilateral delay-minute mix at rates that do not move within a control period.

The bilateral net position for Period 13 2025-26 on services on the Channel Tunnel corridor, together with the per-corridor decomposition, the rate-gap counterfactual against an equal-rate benchmark, and the period-on-period swing, is released to commercial-licence subscribers.

Per-corridor and per-day Schedule 8 net-position figures, and the full responsibility-party breakdown, are released to commercial-licence subscribers.

Source: Network Rail Historic Delay Attribution (HDA) for Period 13 2025-26, ingested into delay_attributions with source: "trust". CP7 rates are published by ORR and applied uniformly across all operators. See delay-attribution methodology.


Delay attribution party split

Across 679 attribution rows totalling 10,372 delay minutes in Period 13 2025-26 for services on the Channel Tunnel corridor, Network Rail carries 42%, operators carry 50%, and third parties carry 9% of the attributed delay minutes.

Responsible party Delay minutes Share of minutes
Network Rail 4,331 42%
Operator 5,161 50%
Third party 880 9%

Cause-code level breakdowns and per-corridor decomposition are released to commercial-licence subscribers.

Source: Network Rail Historic Delay Attribution (HDA) for Period 13 2025-26. Responsibility parties follow the DAPR mapping in the delay_attribution_codes table. See delay-attribution methodology.


What this page does not measure

Pre-activation cancellations fall outside the dataset: TRUST requires an activation event before it records a journey, so services cancelled before activation produce no TRUST record. VSTPs are excluded from the path-utilisation denominator because no Working Timetable row exists against which to measure them. Journeys without a confirmed terminal arrival are excluded from the delay distribution. The 15-minute A2F threshold is a regulatory artefact, not a natural cut-off — the "What the 15-minute threshold hides" panel surfaces the distribution behind that line.


Commercial licence

Four derivations are released to commercial-licence subscribers rather than the public archive. Each one reconciles TRUST source-data against Network Rail's Historic Delay Attribution record independently, not republished from public statistics.

Available under commercial licence. Contact [email protected] for subscription terms.


Methodology & sources

All figures derive from Network Rail's NROD TRUST feed, processed via the Gauge Intelligence ingest pipeline. Period definitions, A2F (Arrival to Fifteen), the Wilson 90% interval, daily anomaly rules, cross-view reconciliation, and delay attribution are documented at:

Data window — period boundaries and the data-as-of cutoff
League tables — cross-view reconciliation across the four analytical views
Anomaly detection — daily A2F SPC rules
Delay attribution — DAPR cause-code breakdown
Forecasting — prediction intervals and possession-exposure estimates

Methodology

Corridor-level A2F punctuality is measured at the Channel Tunnel corridor's 7 monitoring points spanning the Dollands Moor Sidings-to-Hither Green route via Folkestone Central, Ashford International, Tonbridge, Redhill, and Orpington. A service is counted on time if it arrives at the terminal within fifteen minutes of schedule. The 90% confidence interval on each share uses the Wilson score method on the observed denominator. Severity bands across panels apply consistent thresholds: an SPC run-rule trigger on the daily series flags a day as anomalous, and gaps between operator rankings of more than 10 percentage points raise the peer panel into the alert band. See the anomaly-detection methodology for the SPC rules.

Operator rankings on the Channel Tunnel corridor aggregate per operator via TRUST toc_id across every corridor segment traversal in the window, then apply partial-pool shrinkage so small-sample operators stabilise toward the corridor mean. Cross-view reconciliation across the four views (by operator, by destination, by flow, by corridor) is documented in the league-table methodology. Period boundaries and the data-as-of cutoff are documented in the data-window methodology. Data derives from Network Rail's NROD TRUST feed, processed via the Gauge Intelligence NROD pipeline.

The corridor's Schedule 8 net position, the Network Rail / freight-operator delay-attribution breakdown, the per-operator and per-path-quality ghost-path decomposition, the per-operator path-utilisation detail, and Schedule 4 possession exposure for the Channel Tunnel corridor are released to commercial-licence subscribers. The intraday A2F pattern panel is deferred for corridor pages pending the segment-attributed intraday model; this exclusion is disclosed here per the analytical-rigour discipline applied across published pages.

Regulatory context

Network Rail's Control Period 7 obligation, fixed in ORR's PR23 conclusions, imposes a 1.3% target on the Freight Cancellations and Lateness (FCaL) metric by March 2029. A2F is the operator-perspective version of the same threshold: the cancellation-plus-lateness measure that drives the obligation. ORR's Freight rail usage and performance release records that its statistical publications do not compare results against targets. This page does, against the CP7 target and over time.

Revisions

No revisions to date.

A revision restates a published figure because the upstream data changed, typically a Network Rail delay-attribution refresh. The minor tier is corrected in the next release; cells affected carry an (r) flag. The intermediate tier triggers immediate amendment with an (r) flag. The wholesale tier is flagged at the top of the page and notified directly to operators and rail journalists subscribed to revision alerts.

Corrections

No corrections to date.

A correction fixes an error in the published output: an arithmetic slip, a typo, a mis-rendered chart. Revisions are different; they restate a figure because the upstream data changed. The distinction matters because corrections never silently rewrite a published number.